AI & SOFTWARE
AI, built
for real work.
Articles from our enterprise development practice, covering AI agents, business systems, websites, data integration, and inbound support.
We focus on how AI can be built into practical systems for real workflows, not just introduced as a standalone tool.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 Run the Lane? Opus vs Fable as Controller
Swapping the controller to Opus: +15.79 on the merge step alone, reversed across the full lane.

When AI Makes Work Visible, Evaluation Design Decides Fairness
Unease about visibility doesn't come from AI adoption itself — it comes from loose evaluation design. Here is how we think about designing for fairness instead.

For Small Businesses, Generative AI Success Doesn't Start with Model Selection
Before comparing model performance, most small businesses have implementation design to sort out first.

Claude Code + Codex: Does Merging Beat the Best Solo Run?
Does a merged deliverable beat the best single one? The one case where it worked, and what it cost.

Designing Guardrails for AI Agents: Lessons from the OpenAI Presence Announcement
Using OpenAI's Presence announcement as a starting point, we look at how to design AI agent guardrails across scope, approval, and runtime enforcement—and what to settle before deployment.

AI Agent Comparison: Claude Code vs Codex on Real EC Data
The same e-commerce data split two AIs into opposite designs — and broke the scoring first.

Designing Decision Authority for AI Agents: Lessons From China's Implementation Opinions
China's Implementation Opinions on AI agents frame decisions by whose authority makes them. We pair that with a process axis into a two-axis template for authority design.

Claude Code vs Codex: 100 Connect Four Games Head-to-Head
AI-written bots play 100 games under a shared referee — and merging them did not make them stronger.

What AI Adoption Leaves You: Continuous Improvement by Design
The value of AI adoption isn't decided by the model alone. We frame the 'improvement data' that stays with you and how to choose among three implementation patterns.